Katch Invest

The History and Attractiveness of Litigation Funding in the UK

The History and Attractiveness of Litigation Funding in the UK

By Laurent Jeanmart - Katch Investment Group Chairman

Finance is a dynamic space in constant evolution. New products and new areas of investment regularly emerge, and as such capital allocators and investors must decide about the relative attractiveness of an ever-increasing and complex library of potential investment products. The best returns adjusted for risk are available to those able to identify and research early these emerging markets and products. The reward comes as a few years of excellent risk-adjusted returns, before an increasing amount of capital arbs away the investment opportunity. The once emerging market becomes mainstream and the innovative investor then needs to move onto something newer and potentially more attractive.

To understand the attractiveness of an investment in litigation funding, consider the following. According to Solomonic, a UK-based quantitative firm supporting litigation funders, almost exactly half of the UK commercial litigation claims are ruled in favour of the claimant. A litigation funder, in turn, would oftentimes ask a potential claimant to agree on compensation such that its payoff be at least 4 times the cost incurred. This means that for 2 pounds spent, 1 will be lost, and the second one will become 4 pounds, generating a 100% profit over the 2 pounds initially spent.

Litigation funding in the United Kingdom is therefore an emerging -and exciting- new area where outsized returns can be achieved by astute investors employing competent portfolio managers. Litigation funding in Great Britain should be traced back to the 1967 Criminal Law Act, a change in regulation that rendered Maintenance (Maintenance is about people who are not party to a legal case providing funding for that case) and Champetry (Maintenance for a profit) offenses with respect to public policy as neither tort nor crimes. The Act raised the possibility of litigation funding in certain circumstances, but a certain lack of clarity as to what these circumstances were meant that the rise of litigation funding in the country was curtailed- as it turns out, only for a few years.

In the 1990s, a series of law aiming at improving access to redress notably in favour of middle-income individuals that did not qualify for legal aid, abolished Maintenance and Champetry as torts and enabled lawyers to earn success fees in addition to their regular rates. This proved to be a turning point and litigation funding really took off on the back of that regulatory change. An important caveat to that was that the funder was not allowed to influence or manage the case, the client must remain in control. In the Group cases funded by the Katch Litigation Fund, this translates into the existence of a steering committee, which is a small group of individuals representing the claimants and that make all major decisions about the case.

In the years following the sea-change induced by the new laws around litigation funding, a series of major firms, such as Burford Capital (2009), Therium Capital Management (2009), Vannin Capital (2010), and Woodsford Litigation Funding (2010) emerged to take advantage of the improved funding backdrop. The burgeoning and fast-growing industry raised the question about whether the UK government should regulate third-party funding organizations or allow them to self-regulate. Self-regulation prevailed, with the understanding that should it fail, the government would have to step in and regulate. 

In 2012 another milestone was achieved with the passage of the Legal Services Act, creating regulatory room for the development of “alternative business structures”. These alternative business structures permitted nonlawyer ownership of legal services organizations, thus allowing funders and law firms to form closer relationships, including funders investing in law firms and even starting law firms, as Burford did in 2016. As opportunities arose from the confluence of litigation finance and alternative business structures, UK law firms began to take advantage.

Today, the UK litigation finance market appears poised to continue growing. While data can be hard to come by, according to the 2018 Burford survey of law firm and in-house lawyers, 63 percent of UK respondents report “their organization’s use of legal finance has increased in the last two years.” This in essence means that more and more companies are going to ask litigation funders to support them, and the growing market will allow litigation funds to themselves grow and discriminates amongst more cases.

By accessing this website content, you agree to be bound by the conditions.

It is important that you read the following page before proceeding, as it explains certain legal and regulatory restrictions applicable to the distribution of this information. By accessing any content of this website, you agree to be bound by the conditions. If you do not agree to the conditions, please exit the website. Neither Katch Investment Group; Katch Fund Solutions – Global Lending Opportunities Fund, Katch Fund Solutions – Real Estate Lending Fund, or Katch Fund Solutions – Factoring Fund (the “Funds”) will be responsible for any misrepresentations you may make in gaining unauthorized access. It is your responsibility to inform yourself of and to observe all applicable laws and regulations of the relevant jurisdiction. This website content is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The information contained in this website (including marketing presentations, factsheets, and articles) does not constitute a distribution, an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer or invitation is not authorized and/or would be contrary to local law or regulation. This website is not intended for any “U.S. Person” as defined in the Prospectus. For more information write us at info@katchinvest.com. The information contained on this site, and on downloadable materials is believed to be accurate at the date of publication, but no warranty of accuracy is given, and the information is subject to change without notice. Any opinions or estimates included herein constitute a judgment as of this date and are subject to change without notice. If you are in any doubt about the information contained herein please consult your stockbroker, solicitor, accountant, bank manager or other professional adviser. All content and information are being made available free of charge. By proceeding you agree to the exclusion of any liability in respect of any errors or omissions contained in it. No liability is accepted by any person within Katch Investment Group or the Funds for any losses or damage arising from the use or reliance on the information contained herein including, without limitation, any loss of profit, or any other damage direct or consequential.

Investment in emerging market involves risk factors and special considerations which may not be typically associated with investing in more developed markets. Political or economic change and instability may be more likely to occur and have a greater effect on the economies and markets of emerging countries. Adverse government policies, taxation, restrictions on foreign investment and on currency convertibility and repatriation, currency fluctuations and other developments in the laws and regulations of emerging countries in which investment may be made, including expropriation, nationalization or other confiscation could result in loss to the Funds. The risk factors referred to above are not an exhaustive list and reference should be made to the relevant Prospectus. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and you may not get back your original investment. The Funds are intended for sophisticated investors who can accept the risks associated with such an investment including a substantial or complete loss of their investment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. A person within Katch Investment Group and/or Katch Fund Solutions, its affiliates, their directors and the investment funds/accounts it manages may or may not have a position in or with respect to any securities mentioned herein.This website is solely reserved to investors that are located in France and defined as Professional Investors as per the AIFM Directive, or investors that are located in Switzerland and defined as Well-Informed Investors as per the Luxembourg act of 23 July 2016 on reserved alternative funds.

Special note for investors in Switzerland: Home country of the Fund: Luxembourg. The representative in Switzerland is 1741 Fund Solutions AG, Burggraben 16, CH-9000 St. Gallen. The Swiss Paying Agent in Switzerland is Tellco LTD, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 6430 Schwyz, Switzerland. The offering memorandum and other key investor information document or fund contract as well as the annual reports may be obtained free of charge from the representative. In respect of the units distributed in and from Switzerland, the place of performance and jurisdiction is the registered office of the Representative.

If you have read, understood, and accepted above conditions, you can enter.